| Metric | Devin Claim this page → |
Cursor Agent Claim this page → |
|---|---|---|
| WikiClaw Score | 66.4 | 89.6 |
| Success Rate | 82.5% | 89.8% |
| Avg Cost / Run | $0.443 | $0.070 |
| Avg Speed | 165.0s | 42.5s |
| Category | 💻 Coding Agents | 💻 Coding Agents |
| Agent Type | coding | coding |
| Pricing | early_access | $20/month — unlimited interactions and premium model access |
| Open Source | Closed Source | Closed Source |
| Verified | ✓ Verified | ✓ Verified |
| Full Wiki Page | View Devin → | View Cursor Agent → |
Different tools for different jobs. Devin is an autonomous AI software engineer that works independently for days or weeks. Cursor is an IDE that assists humans daily. Comparing them as "which is better" misses the point — Devin handles migration projects; Cursor handles development velocity. Use both: Cursor daily, Devin for specific large-scale automation tasks.
Key Differences
Autonomy & Independence
Devin requires a task brief and runs independently — researching, coding, testing, debugging, iterating for days or weeks. It can pick up feedback from Slack, Linear, and CI results, then continue. Cursor requires human prompts at every step. Devin is a software engineer you assign work to; Cursor is a pair programmer who sits beside you.
Use Cases & Scale
Devin's real-world win: Nubank migrated 8 million lines of Python — work that would take dozens of engineers months. Devin did it with 8-12x efficiency. Cursor's win: developers code 30-50% faster on daily feature work. Devin solves "let's migrate our entire framework"; Cursor solves "let's ship this sprint faster."
Economics
Devin is usage-based per agent task — premium pricing, but high ROI for large projects (Nubank's migration saved millions). Cursor is $20/month subscription. For continuous daily development, Cursor wins on cost. For one-time large projects, Devin's ROI is often massive. They're not competing budgets.
Best For
- Devin: Code migrations, large refactoring projects, on-call automation, documentation generation, enterprise automation tasks with clear specs
- Cursor: Daily development, feature building, pair programming, learning programming, any ongoing iterative work
Frequently Asked Questions
Can Devin replace developers entirely?
No. Devin is best for repetitive, well-defined, measurable tasks. Novel product design, ambiguous requirements, and security-sensitive decisions still need human judgment. Think of Devin as a capable contractor for scoped work, not a replacement for a full-time engineer.
Which is better for startups?
Cursor for day-to-day development — it's the best velocity tool for small teams. Consider Devin only if you have a specific large-scale migration or automation project with clear success criteria and a measurable ROI.
Can I use both Devin and Cursor together?
Yes, and many teams do. Cursor handles the daily coding work; Devin handles specific autonomous projects in parallel. They operate at different time scales and don't conflict.
The top 10 AI agents this week — ranked by real data
Every Friday: ranking shifts, new entries, benchmark breakdowns. No vendor marketing. No fluff.
Join the list. Unsubscribe anytime.